BANK • PEŁNY PODGLĄD

codzienność: The Wisdom of Crowds

Historia brzmi jak fake • wikipedia-seeded

← Bank
candidateneeds-reviewC 100%
Fakt używany przez pipeline
The opening anecdote relates Francis Galton's surprise that the crowd at a county fair accurately guessed the weight of an ox when the median of their individual guesses was taken (the median was closer to the ox's true butchered weight than the estimates of most crowd members).
Pełniejszy materiał źródłowy / excerpt
The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations, published in 2004, is a book written by James Surowiecki about the aggregation of information in groups, resulting in decisions that, he argues, are often better than could have been made by any single member of the group. The book presents numerous case studies and anecdotes to illustrate its argument, and touches on several fields, primarily economics and psychology. The opening anecdote relates Francis Galton's surprise that the crowd at a county fair accurately guessed the weight of an ox when the median of their individual guesses was taken (the median was closer to the ox's true butchered weight than the estimates of most crowd members). The book relates to diverse collections of independently deciding individuals, rather than crowd psychology as traditionally understood. Its central thesis, that a diverse collection of independently deciding individuals is likely to make certain types of decisions and predictions better than individuals or even experts, draws many parallels with statistical sampling; however, there is little overt discussion of statistics in the book. Its title is an allusion to Charles Mackay's Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, published in 1841.
Kategoria: codzienność
Rodzina: codzienność
Jakość źródła: 65/100
Próby weryfikacji: 3
Notatka fact-checku: Fact-check 3.0-content-aware: no sufficient claim-bound corroboration after 3 healthy attempts. Scope=verify the factual claim. Required independent sources=2; stored evidence groups=1. Provider/API errors did not consume attempts. | Fact-check 4.3.2: research wznowiony bez zdejmowania HOLD. Poprzednia metoda: factcheck-300-content-aware. | Fact-check 4.3.2: research wznowiony bez zdejmowania HOLD. Poprzednia metoda: factcheck-weekly-research-432.

ŹRÓDŁA I DOWODY

3 zapisanych źródeł
Wikipedia ENPOTWIERDZAniezależne

Evidence: 100 • authority: 72

The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations, published in 2004, is a book written by James Surowiecki about the aggregation of information in groups, resulting in decisions that, he argues, are often better than could have been made by any single member of the group. The book presents numerous case studies and anecdotes to illustrate its argument, and touches on several fields, primarily economics and psychology. The opening anecdote relates Francis Galton's surprise that the crowd at a county fair accurately guessed the weight of an ox when the median of their individual guesses was taken (the media…

Otwórz źródło ↗
Center for Open Sciencepomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 45 • authority: 88

On the Quantification of Crowd Wisdom, Optimal Crowd Size, and the Mean-Median Dilemma. Crowd wisdom is a fascinating metaphor in the realm of collective intelligence. However, even for the simple case of estimation tasks of one continuous value, the quantification of the phenomenon lacks some conceptual clarity. Two interrelated questions of quantification are at stake. First, how we can quantify the degree of crowd wisdom in a sample and how it can be distinguished from the individual wisdom of its members? Two measures will be presented and discussed. One can also be used to quantify optimal crowd sizes. Even purely statistical, it turns out that smaller crowds are more advisable when in…

Otwórz źródło ↗
Elsevier BVpomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 34 • authority: 88

Small Crowds are Wise When the World Can Surprise. Decisions about political, economic, legal, and health issues are often made by simple majority voting in groups that rarely exceed 30-40 members and are typically much smaller. Given that wisdom is usually attributed to large crowds, and that technological advances make group meetings easier than ever before, shouldn’t committees be larger? In many real-life situations, expert groups encounter mostly easy tasks on which average individual accuracy is above chance, and some surprisingly difficult tasks where most members guess wrongly, such as elections with unexpected outcomes or tricky knowledge questions. We show that, when groups cannot…

Otwórz źródło ↗