BANK • PEŁNY PODGLĄD

zwierzęta: Scholarly peer review

Fakty • wikipedia-seeded

← Bank
candidateneeds-reviewC 85%
Fakt używany przez pipeline
Academic peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) academic field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review.
Pełniejszy materiał źródłowy / excerpt
Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (i.e., the editor-in-chief, the editorial board, or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph, or in the proceedings of an academic conference. If the identities of authors are not revealed to each other, the procedure is called dual-anonymous peer review. Academic peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) academic field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Peer review is widely used to increase academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals. However, criticism of peer review include failure to prevent publication of invalid research or scientific fraud, low correlation with future impact, slowness, and lack of accountability.
Kategoria: zwierzęta
Rodzina: zwierzeta
Jakość źródła: 65/100
Próby weryfikacji: 3
Notatka fact-checku: Fact-check 3.0-content-aware: no sufficient claim-bound corroboration after 3 healthy attempts. Scope=verify the factual claim. Required independent sources=2; stored evidence groups=1. Provider/API errors did not consume attempts. | Fact-check 4.3.2: research wznowiony bez zdejmowania HOLD. Poprzednia metoda: factcheck-300-content-aware. | Fact-check 4.3.2: research wznowiony bez zdejmowania HOLD. Poprzednia metoda: factcheck-weekly-research-432.

ŹRÓDŁA I DOWODY

11 zapisanych źródeł
Wikipedia ENPOTWIERDZAniezależne

Evidence: 100 • authority: 72

Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (i.e., the editor-in-chief, the editorial board, or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph, or in the proceedings of an academic conference. If the identities of authors are not revealed to each other, the procedure is called dual-anonymous peer review. Academic peer review requires a comm…

Otwórz źródło ↗
Wikipedia ENpomocnicze

Evidence: 61 • authority: 72

Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work (peers). It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility. In academia, scholarly peer review is typically used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication. The reviewers are experts in the topic at hand and anonymous. The type and by the field or profession in which the activity occurs can categorize peer review, e.g., medical peer review. It can also be used as a teaching tool. Henry Oldenburg (1619–…

Otwórz źródło ↗
Frontiers Media SApomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 42 • authority: 88

Otwórz źródło ↗
Wikipedia ENpomocnicze

Evidence: 42 • authority: 72

Peer Community in (PCI) is a non-profit scientific organization that offers an editorial process of open science by creating specific communities of researchers reviewing and recommending preprints in their field. Since 2021, a new journal, Peer Community Journal', publishes recommended preprints. This initiative offers relief from the cost supported by academic organisations to publishing in open access and provide access to the literature (for papers that are not in open access), which has grown faster than the inflation in the several years.

Otwórz źródło ↗
F1000 Research Ltdpomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 39 • authority: 80

Otwórz źródło ↗
F1000 Research Ltdpomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 39 • authority: 80

Otwórz źródło ↗
Elsevier BVpomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 39 • authority: 80

Otwórz źródło ↗
Europe PMC / Journal of Korean medical sciencepomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 39 • authority: 92

Otwórz źródło ↗
Europe PMC / Frontiers in public healthpomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 36 • authority: 92

"I'm not a graduate or doctor, yet we are all together:" articulating a partnership model for community-engaged research.. Introduction Research with Expert Advisors on Drug Use (READU) is a community-engaged research collaborative of people with lived and living experience, clinicians, and academic researchers. We sought to evaluate the challenges and rewards of the partnership model. Materials and methods Using the Peer Engagement Process Evaluation framework, the READU team collaborated on generating a list of focus group topics. All ( n = 8) active team members participated in a focus group. Thematic analysis was used to identify key ideas. Results Five main themes were identified. "Col…

Otwórz źródło ↗
Europe PMC / Frontiers in psychologypomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 36 • authority: 92

Designing for self-regulation: development and preliminary user evaluation of a student-facing learning analytics app in blended higher education.. Background Blended learning environments place substantial demands on students' capacity to plan, monitor, and evaluate their own academic work, yet most technology-mediated interventions in higher education prioritize instructor-led monitoring over student-centered autonomy. Objectives This study aimed to characterize the challenges and self-regulated learning strategies of university students in blended learning contexts, design and validate a student-oriented learning analytics application natively integrated into a learning management system…

Otwórz źródło ↗
Wikipedia ENpomocnicze

Evidence: 36 • authority: 72

An academic journal or scholarly journal is a periodical publication in which scholarship relating to a particular academic discipline is published. They serve as permanent and transparent forums for the dissemination, scrutiny, and discussion of research. Unlike professional magazines or trade magazines, the articles are mostly written by researchers rather than staff writers employed by the journal. They nearly universally require peer review for research articles or other scrutiny from contemporaries competent and established in their respective fields. Academic journals trace their origins back to the 17th century, with the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society being establish…

Otwórz źródło ↗