BANK • PEŁNY PODGLĄD

ludzkie-ciekawostki: Consciousness

Bezużyteczne Fakty • wikipedia-seeded

← Bank
candidateneeds-reviewC 83%
Fakt używany przez pipeline
There is no consensus on what exactly needs to be studied, or whether consciousness can be considered a scientific concept.
Pełniejszy materiał źródłowy / excerpt
Consciousness is being aware of something internal to one's self, or of states or objects in one's external environment. It has been the topic of extensive explanations, analyses, and debate among philosophers, scientists, and theologians for millennia. There is no consensus on what exactly needs to be studied, or whether consciousness can be considered a scientific concept. In some explanations it is synonymous with mind, while in others it is considered an aspect of it. In the past, consciousness meant one's "inner life": the world of introspection, private thought, imagination, and volition. Today, it often includes various forms of cognition, experience, feeling, or perception. It may be awareness, awareness of awareness, metacognition, or self-awareness, either continuously changing or not. There is also a medical definition that helps, for example, to discern "coma" from other states. The disparate range of research, notions, and speculations raises some curiosity about whether the right questions are being asked. Examples of the range of descriptions, definitions and explanations are: ordered distinction between self and environment, simple wakefulness, one's sense of selfh…
Kategoria: ludzkie-ciekawostki
Rodzina: ludzkie-ciekawostki
Jakość źródła: 65/100
Próby weryfikacji: 3
Notatka fact-checku: Fact-check 3.0-content-aware: no sufficient claim-bound corroboration after 3 healthy attempts. Scope=verify the factual claim. Required independent sources=2; stored evidence groups=1. Provider/API errors did not consume attempts. | Fact-check 4.3.2: research wznowiony bez zdejmowania HOLD. Poprzednia metoda: factcheck-300-content-aware.

ŹRÓDŁA I DOWODY

4 zapisanych źródeł
Wikipedia ENPOTWIERDZAniezależne

Evidence: 100 • authority: 72

Consciousness is being aware of something internal to one's self, or of states or objects in one's external environment. It has been the topic of extensive explanations, analyses, and debate among philosophers, scientists, and theologians for millennia. There is no consensus on what exactly needs to be studied, or whether consciousness can be considered a scientific concept. In some explanations it is synonymous with mind, while in others it is considered an aspect of it. In the past, consciousness meant one's "inner life": the world of introspection, private thought, imagination, and volition. Today, it often includes various forms of cognition, experience, feeling, or perception. It may b…

Otwórz źródło ↗
Wikipedia ENpomocnicze

Evidence: 74 • authority: 72

The meaning of life is the concept of an individual's life, human life, or existence in general having an inherent significance or a philosophical point. There is no consensus on the specifics of such a concept, or whether the concept itself even exists in any objective sense. Thinking and discourse on the topic is sought in the English language through questions such as—but not limited to—"What is the meaning of life?", "What is the purpose of existence?", and "Why are we here?". There have been many proposed answers to these questions from many different cultural and ideological backgrounds. The search for life's meaning has produced much philosophical, scientific, theological, and metaph…

Otwórz źródło ↗
Springer Netherlandspomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 42 • authority: 80

Scientific Eliminativism: Why There Can Be No Science of Consciousness

Otwórz źródło ↗
Europe PMC / Neuroscience of consciousnesspomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 42 • authority: 92

Pluralism within limits: how to make the idea of multiple NCC kinds useful.. Recently, several authors have argued that the current impasse in consciousness science supports a pluralistic interpretation: the view that seemingly contradictory findings may both be valid because consciousness can be brought about in different ways, each sufficient to generate conscious experience. We analyze different versions of pluralism to determine under what conditions it offers a viable interpretation of consciousness science. We argue that viable pluralism requires a two-factor framework distinguishing general consciousness factors (mechanisms rendering contents conscious) from content encoding itself.…

Otwórz źródło ↗