BANK • PEŁNY PODGLĄD

Ciekawostka: The muzzle of a lion is like a fingerprint - no two lions have the same pattern of whiskers

Bezużyteczne Fakty • uselessfacts-api

candidateneeds-reviewC 72%

Fakt używany przez pipeline

The muzzle of a lion is like a fingerprint - no two lions have the same pattern of whiskers.

Pełniejszy materiał źródłowy / excerpt

The muzzle of a lion is like a fingerprint - no two lions have the same pattern of whiskers.

Kategoria: ciekawostki

Rodzina: ciekawostki

Jakość źródła: 35/100

Próby weryfikacji: 3

Notatka fact-checku: Fact-check 3.0-content-aware: no sufficient claim-bound corroboration after 3 healthy attempts. Scope=verify the factual claim. Required independent sources=2; stored evidence groups=0. Provider/API errors did not consume attempts. | Fact-check 4.3.2: research wznowiony bez zdejmowania HOLD. Poprzednia metoda: factcheck-300-content-aware.

ŹRÓDŁA I DOWODY

2 zapisanych źródeł

Walter de Gruyter GmbHpomocniczeniezależne

Evidence: 49 • authority: 88

Knowing Lions and Understanding “Lion”: Two Jobs for Concepts in Ockham?. Abstract Externalist readings of Ockham are currently most prominent in the literature. For instance, an externalist interpretation with respect both to mental content and the meaning of expressions is advocated by prominent scholars. In this paper, I want to argue that although this externalist picture is certainly not incorrect, it is nonetheless incomplete. As I show, Ockham distinguishes between two ways of acquiring concepts: one of them can be accounted for in wholly externalist terms while the other involves the understanding of linguistic expressions. According to the reading of Ockham I suggest here, it turns…

Otwórz źródło ↗

Useless Facts APIpomocnicze

Evidence: — • authority: 35

Otwórz źródło ↗